Ebook Conclusion: What directions for our future? How to identify the probability of the greatest truth?

Why do I submit several of my scenarios (?) Sometimes mixed scenarios (?) In the short, medium, long term (?)

• Major scenarios based on new open tech paradigms, new additional segments which will be added, overlap, interpose, oppose, complement each other ... (Re) Balance the segments, systems, processes, governance ... traditional. Fashion words decentralizations, distributions (DLT, block chains, Blockchains, Crypto, Tokens, Tokenization ...) could be major players in shaping our futures who could take a completely different orientation on a scale short, medium and long term. One of the fears could also relate to the concept of decentralizing, re-distributing for even more centralization in the medium or long term, which could carry the risk of moving us away from the areas of equilibrium also possibly (?)

• There would be as many scenarios as possible as there would be a human being and therefore of angle of view. If the machine could be your ally, your faithful friend, your servant, support, your complement, relief, ... for others they could be enemy, harmful, harmful, harmful, destructive, insulating, contemptuous, unfair, not equal, degrading, ... for others they could also go so far as to cause irreversible or even fatal harm ... (?) Difficult exercise with a small human brain trying to consider all cases, to bring out a major trend, however, I tried to practice it with attempts at wills of (full) consciousness and objectivity. In your opinion!

• I do not pretend to be able to be able to tell you 100% what our future could be, I am neither clairvoyant nor magician, my risk analyzes are certainly truncated by my DNA my neurons somewhat degraded , my nature, my unconsciousness, my incompetences, my hidden frustrations ... All that could also perhaps interact unconsciously to truncate my speech, my attempts of tests & its approaches of possible scenarios. Any attempt to approach reality is tedious, it would moreover certainly be nurtured by the fruits of my subjectivities, erroneous interpretations also sometimes shifted which by dint of reflections may distance me even a little more from reality, or my creative and sometimes even recreational imagination. This Miss YePapote could also be completely off the mark, It is also a risk to consider, be indulgent let there be the chance to perhaps improve at its own pace, if there was a risk & in order to avoid just staying yourself, and always make up your own mind.

• All attempts to expose you to a formal future in a box or strict unitary orientation, would for my part rest in my opinion on futuristic & speculative subjectivity. It is in this sense that I wanted to orient my tests, my R&D work ... through exhibitions of focus zooms on the probabilities of scenarios in strong trend very likely, or minor ones which can nevertheless have a major influence by cumulative domino effect. Basically I offer you in a community way my opinions, my analyzes on a tray to allow you to refine yours, to each their risk analysis opportunities, the direction of our future, of the one we choose to leave to children of this world would be based above all on the cumulative synergies of Collective Intelligence. Demography being exponential it would be tiresome to see pretentious perhaps to pretend to be able to put itself in the head of everyone, human emotional intelligence has its limits, we are not machines (endowed with the power of quantum algo).

• Will the scales of our future be oriented towards more continuous improvement in order to maintain or restore the states of equilibrium or more Global imbalance ... (?)

• Balances or imbalances will be individual or collective ... (?)

• What will be the major forces that could guide or even decide our futures? Could the latter be guided by the summons of collective aspirations or and the latter will be dictated to us, imposed without our having the leisure to be able to shape it in our own way? Who will be the predominant decision-makers, or major influencers: Man by his quantitative weight or and Governance entities, by state control by their qualitative power. In life while functioning at equilibrium our future may be a balance of the two which should be finely regulated by providing permanent energy (?)

• In other words, the main trends of Community Collective Intelligence: Will, Negative positive energy, Optimism or pessimism, Wisdom, Self-education, Awareness, Mindfulness, Responsibility, Accountability, Discipline, Belief, Tenacity, Pugnacity, Balance, Reference, Aspirations , Objectives, Ambitions, Values, New creation of values, Reasoned, Reasonable, Readjusting priorities, Importance of priorities given to respect for fundamental rights, to child protection ... these are not areas in which I can pretend to excel. Nevertheless I remain persuaded that "We" are the main author, decision maker of the book, and of the chapters of our lives: how many volumes, chapter, sub-chapters, quantity, quality, value ... leave a trace or not ... Free to each one, it is in this sense that the life which is offered to us is beautiful.

• In my opinion. staying optimistic, or even the opportunities rather than the risks, allows you to conserve your energy to focus on what you think is the balance of a future. The positive will inevitably end up attracting the positive. It is a game of great patience, conviction & personal or collective belief ... (?)

• ...