| Global Methodos of these Yepapote Hand-made co-services ;-)

 

... ∞    OVERVIEW ∞ PRE-PREMISES ∞ FOCUS MODE CYCLE ZOOM & DE-ZOOM ∞ PRE-   GLOBAL AUDIT ∞ REFINING ∞ ...

... ∞ IDENTIFICATION ∞    EXTERNAL INTERNAL OVERALL ANALYSIS ∞ OPPORTUNITY ∞ RISK ∞ ASSESSMENT   ∞   DIAGNOSIS ∞ ...

... ∞ CRITICAL RISK IDENTIFICATION ∞ BLOCKING POINT ∞ PRIORITY ∞ CONVERSION RISK TO OPPORTUNITY ∞ ...

... ∞ R&D ∞ REFLECTION ∞ STRATEGY ∞ DUE DILIGENCE ∞ OPTIMIZATION ∞ LEVERS OF IMPROVEMENT ∞ ...

... ∞ OBJECTIVE ∞ ACTION PLAN ∞ MONITORING ∞ STEERING TRIM ∞ ∞ ∞ LINEARISATION ....

 

• METHDO MIND-SET: SOFT HARD SKILLS SKILLS ∞ INNATES ACQUIRED ....

• METHODO SWOT MOFF: STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES THREATS OPPORTUNITIES ....

• PDCA METHOD: PLAN DO CHECK ACT ∞ CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT E ....

• GLOBAL METHOD: CUSTOMIZABLE CUSTOMIZABLE FLEX ....

• ETC ...

 

• Depending on the co-services requested, the nature, specific needs ... the methodologies used could be standardized, personalized, customized, adapted, adaptive, flex, tailor-made, hand-made, ... (?)

• Following the analysis of your needs as a whole, I could use global macro methodologies by making several tools interact together or more micro by supporting the use of one tool more particularly than another to respond to the nature of the specificity of the need ... (?)

• Because in my opinion the triggering of the action would also rest on the finesse of the relevance of the choice of means to be used. In other words the alchemy of finding the right dosage, program, detergent ... the right key-lock model to select to aim to achieve these objectives ... (?)

• The particularity of these co-services would be based on the fact that we are all unique, different in 360 ° in this sense our needs are not reproducible from one individual to another. There would not be a single method in my opinion but a lot of methods to test, research, develop, sometimes overlap ... to try to match the delicacy of the perimeter parameters ... of the specificity of the need ( ? )

 

Let's dive together, explore the surface at the abyss

To use the pictorial illustrated example imagined around the coast. If we were to dive to explore the depths, even the underwater abysses of our life, we will not all evolve at the same depth and we may not all operate the same decompression stages to descend and ascend. In the first place, we are not all followers of the same environments, some prefer the transparency of hot water, others the extreme cold environments the optical disorder or and complete darkness would not hinder them absolutely, quite the contrary. In addition we do not all have the same innate or acquired pulmonary capacities, the same internal ear resistance, we do not all have the same thickness of coveralls to protect us, nor the same equipment to allow us to descend deeper, or the same training, and sometimes we have little time to train. For security it would also sometimes be necessary to be aware of this in order to agree not to go down too much. The breaking point would be the hypoxia of the depths the caress of its intoxication, once reached it would sometimes be very tedious to be able to go back up, even lethal irreversible. The most difficult exercise in our lives could be based on the difficulty of being able to maintain the balance of mindfulness of its benchmarks, adjust them modulate model, even recalibrate them if necessary ... I do not pretend myself even be a model but collective improvement is in my opinion possible (?)

 

 

 

| Micra global methodologies of these co-services